QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
|
Analysing a so-called "Comparison" about Virtualisation at IBM DeveloperworksWednesday, October 15. 2008Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I think "dynamic" does not refer to reconfigure manually, but it talks about sharing resources in pools with weights and min-gurantee.
Apart from missing on the latest CMT-offerings(the 5440 in particular) I think the IBM article is spot on.
While IBMs virtualization is mature, feature rich and conistant across the pSeries server line, Sun virtualization is a mess. The Uni/Quad XSB partitioning on M-series line is no real virtualization by any definition. It is just a crude hardware partitioning. For CMT the virtualization is in its infancy and certainly not enterprise ready. No redundant IO-servers. Memory resizing requires a reboot of the partition. I haven't tried the container feature in AIX 6.1. However it seems more functional than Solaris containers already in its first release. Containers are by no means any replacement for physical virtualisation but has its place where applicable.
An mailaddress at googlemail just for lpars ??? Looks like a hired gun or an otherwise professional interested person
Could you elaborate on your comment, that the container feature is more elaborate in AIX? I donīt think so, and i have done some research on both technology (Container by job, WPARS by interest) BTW: LPARS are not a physical virtualisation. Uni/Quad-XSB are such mechanisms. You talk about hypervisor based virtualisation. Thatīs isnīt psysical at all ... the software just sits at a different place And my personal opinion: A unix system doesnīt need virtualisation in any way, as Unix is virtualisation. Virtualisation in the sense of LPARS/Containers/LDOMS is a security feature to generate a multitude of admistrative domains. So i prefere containers instead of even LDOMS for most tasks. |
+1The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Comments about Lieber SPON, ...
Fri, 17.05.2013 08:09
Du solltest auch noch JS ausch
alten, dann bekommst du auch n
icht diese lustige Nachricht ü
ber AdBlocker
Sun, 12.05.2013 16:52
Honestly? Don't know .... and
will not speculate about it h
ere.
When i worked as an a
dmin (or later project e [...]
Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License
![]() ![]() ![]() Blog Administration |
An commentator at this article stated, that you donīt have redundant I/O servers. My colleague Martin Mueller pointed me at the Immersion Week to a fact that i wasnīt really aware of (albeit itīs obvious when you read the documentation, i just didnīt real
Tracked: Nov 29, 20:36