QuicksearchNavigationEvents12.01 - 1. Treffen MUCOSUG
20.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Langen
22.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Stuttgart
27.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Berlin
27.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Berlin
29.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Hamburg
03.02 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Ratingen
![]() Kategorien
|
Analysing a so-called "Comparison" about Virtualisation at IBM DeveloperworksWednesday, October 15. 2008Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I think "dynamic" does not refer to reconfigure manually, but it talks about sharing resources in pools with weights and min-gurantee.
Apart from missing on the latest CMT-offerings(the 5440 in particular) I think the IBM article is spot on.
While IBMs virtualization is mature, feature rich and conistant across the pSeries server line, Sun virtualization is a mess. The Uni/Quad XSB partitioning on M-series line is no real virtualization by any definition. It is just a crude hardware partitioning. For CMT the virtualization is in its infancy and certainly not enterprise ready. No redundant IO-servers. Memory resizing requires a reboot of the partition. I haven't tried the container feature in AIX 6.1. However it seems more functional than Solaris containers already in its first release. Containers are by no means any replacement for physical virtualisation but has its place where applicable.
An mailaddress at googlemail just for lpars ??? Looks like a hired gun or an otherwise professional interested person
Could you elaborate on your comment, that the container feature is more elaborate in AIX? I donīt think so, and i have done some research on both technology (Container by job, WPARS by interest) BTW: LPARS are not a physical virtualisation. Uni/Quad-XSB are such mechanisms. You talk about hypervisor based virtualisation. Thatīs isnīt psysical at all ... the software just sits at a different place And my personal opinion: A unix system doesnīt need virtualisation in any way, as Unix is virtualisation. Virtualisation in the sense of LPARS/Containers/LDOMS is a security feature to generate a multitude of admistrative domains. So i prefere containers instead of even LDOMS for most tasks. |
The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking open.bc My photos SyndicationComments about Itīs slashing time ... Thu, 08.01.2009 19:29 I didnīt forget them ... as i wrote about them earlier and i wrote at the beginning "besid es the Sun RIF" ... about The Sell Rating from Goldman Sucks Thu, 08.01.2009 18:12 Well, from recent history, it looks like banks were way over leveraged compared to your ty pical business, and seem [...] about The Sell Rating from Goldman Sucks Thu, 08.01.2009 17:36 I actually think it's a good t ime to add some sun shares to the mix about Itīs slashing time ... Thu, 08.01.2009 17:17 another 2700 at creative labs: http://www.computerbase.de/n ews/wirtschaft/unternehmen/200 9/januar/creative_techno [...] Getaggte ArtikelAMD Apple avs Bahn Blogging Blogosphere braindump Business Travel CeBIT cec cec2006 CMT del.icio.us deutsch dtrace fliegen Fundsache General Hamburg IBM i hate sundays Intel iscsi jumpstart Links Linux lksf Mindfuck Movies Music Musik Niagara Opensolaris Opteron Photographie policy of ... Politik Security Solaris storage Sun suncec2007 sunw t1 The IT Business Ultrasparc ultrasparc t1 Wirtschaft Work ZFS
Blog Administration |
An commentator at this article stated, that you donīt have redundant I/O servers. My colleague Martin Mueller pointed me at the Immersion Week to a fact that i wasnīt really aware of (albeit itīs obvious when you read the documentation, i just didnīt real
Tracked: Nov 29, 20:36