QuicksearchCodenews SearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works at Sun Microsystems GmbH in Germany, a subsidiary of Oracle. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
NavigationCategories
|
Analysing a so-called "Comparison" about Virtualisation at IBM DeveloperworksWednesday, October 15. 2008Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I think "dynamic" does not refer to reconfigure manually, but it talks about sharing resources in pools with weights and min-gurantee.
Apart from missing on the latest CMT-offerings(the 5440 in particular) I think the IBM article is spot on.
While IBMs virtualization is mature, feature rich and conistant across the pSeries server line, Sun virtualization is a mess. The Uni/Quad XSB partitioning on M-series line is no real virtualization by any definition. It is just a crude hardware partitioning. For CMT the virtualization is in its infancy and certainly not enterprise ready. No redundant IO-servers. Memory resizing requires a reboot of the partition. I haven't tried the container feature in AIX 6.1. However it seems more functional than Solaris containers already in its first release. Containers are by no means any replacement for physical virtualisation but has its place where applicable.
An mailaddress at googlemail just for lpars ??? Looks like a hired gun or an otherwise professional interested person
Could you elaborate on your comment, that the container feature is more elaborate in AIX? I donīt think so, and i have done some research on both technology (Container by job, WPARS by interest) BTW: LPARS are not a physical virtualisation. Uni/Quad-XSB are such mechanisms. You talk about hypervisor based virtualisation. Thatīs isnīt psysical at all ... the software just sits at a different place And my personal opinion: A unix system doesnīt need virtualisation in any way, as Unix is virtualisation. Virtualisation in the sense of LPARS/Containers/LDOMS is a security feature to generate a multitude of admistrative domains. So i prefere containers instead of even LDOMS for most tasks. |
Links in this articleThe LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Twitterfeedstwitter.com/c0t0d0s0
just blogged: Big CIFS/SMB putback: A large change found its way into the Opensolaris Code base: Headlining with w... http://bit.ly/9IGb2y twitter.com/codenews 6932434 AAC adapter GUI hang when creating or deleting RAID http://bit.ly/cZVKE0 twitter.com/SunPatches 128365-04 - Sun Crypto Accelerator 6000 1.1: Driver Patch. Available for SPARC since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/agl9Nw twitter.com/SolPatchesX86 118192-04 - SunOS 5.9_x86: gtar patch. Available since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/cbnoJ7 twitter.com/SolPatchesSPARC 118191-04 - SunOS 5.9: gtar patch. Available since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/cb2Drj Web 2.0Contact
Networking open.bc My photos SyndicationTagged articlesAMD Apple avs Bahn Blogging Blogosphere braindump Business Travel CeBIT cec cec2006 CMT del.icio.us deutsch dtrace fliegen Fundsache General Hamburg IBM i hate sundays Intel iscsi jumpstart Links Linux lksf Mindfuck Movies Music Musik Niagara Opensolaris Opteron Photographie policy of ... Politik Security Solaris storage Sun suncec2007 sunw t1 The IT Business Ultrasparc ultrasparc t1 Wirtschaft Work ZFS
Comments about Reengining
Sat, 20.03.2010 21:36
I didn't have special interest
in airplanes, but your articl
es about airplanes are very go
od. They have made to ta [...]
Sat, 20.03.2010 08:55
Yes. And I just don't like the
way they're killing all of Su
n brands.
They could just buy
, help, let live, contro [...]
Sat, 20.03.2010 08:49
Well, I don't think many peopl
e were using Solaris at home b
efore Oracle acquisition too,
I see home servers more [...]
about Who are you?
Sat, 20.03.2010 02:15
Ich bin im Rahmen der Diskussi
on um das Zugangserschwerungsg
esetz auf dein Blog gestoßen.
Als Linux-Begeisterter d [...]
Sat, 20.03.2010 00:32
The article doesn't explain wh
y the adquisition of Sun is go
ing to be a sucessfull. It onl
y says that we all know: [...]
Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License
![]() ![]() ![]() Blog Administration |
An commentator at this article stated, that you donīt have redundant I/O servers. My colleague Martin Mueller pointed me at the Immersion Week to a fact that i wasnīt really aware of (albeit itīs obvious when you read the documentation, i just didnīt real
Tracked: Nov 29, 20:36