QuicksearchCodenews SearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works at Sun Microsystems GmbH in Germany, a subsidiary of Oracle. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
NavigationCategories
|
ZFS in 10.5 ?Saturday, August 26. 2006Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
"The Sun StorEdge 6140 looks almost as nice as an Xraid and is a real storage solution. Would open an huge market"
Well. Or not. As much as I like Sun hardware, I don't see that coming. Typical Apple Customers need sustained streamed I/O, not huge IOPS for random I/O. However, sustained streamed I/O is exactly what Xserve RAID offers at a good price point. The 6140 can do the same, of course, and probably somewhat better, but will a typical Apple shop pay roughly triple the price of the Apple product, for a comparable configuration? Let's not forget that we are talking about 46.000$ instead of 14.000$ for a full SATA configuration. If all you need is lots of SATA drives for video, rendering output, scans etc., why use a 6140? Looks like overkill to me. If I were responsible for storage marketing at Sun, I'd instead evaluate marketing the thumper for the Apple market... To me, that would make much more sense. Oh, and along the way I'd also make sure Sun customers in Germany don't end up in "The current page contains no data for your language or authorization level. " if they try to access the "Storage" pages... (since about three weeks now).
I would use a different storage, but the new 6140 looks most mac-like
|
Links in this articleThe LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Twitterfeedstwitter.com/c0t0d0s0
just blogged: Reengining: I've learned in the last few weeks that a simple design decision can make your life much... http://bit.ly/d9luy8 twitter.com/codenews 6935782 need to manually increment build number one more time http://bit.ly/aMqEbX twitter.com/SunPatches 128365-04 - Sun Crypto Accelerator 6000 1.1: Driver Patch. Available for SPARC since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/agl9Nw twitter.com/SolPatchesX86 118192-04 - SunOS 5.9_x86: gtar patch. Available since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/cbnoJ7 twitter.com/SolPatchesSPARC 118191-04 - SunOS 5.9: gtar patch. Available since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/cb2Drj Web 2.0Contact
Networking open.bc My photos SyndicationTagged articlesAMD Apple avs Bahn Blogging Blogosphere braindump Business Travel CeBIT cec cec2006 CMT del.icio.us deutsch dtrace fliegen Fundsache General Hamburg IBM i hate sundays Intel iscsi jumpstart Links Linux lksf Mindfuck Movies Music Musik Niagara Opensolaris Opteron Photographie policy of ... Politik Security Solaris storage Sun suncec2007 sunw t1 The IT Business Ultrasparc ultrasparc t1 Wirtschaft Work ZFS
CommentsSat, 20.03.2010 08:55
Yes. And I just don't like the
way they're killing all of Su
n brands.
They could just buy
, help, let live, contro [...]
Sat, 20.03.2010 08:49
Well, I don't think many peopl
e were using Solaris at home b
efore Oracle acquisition too,
I see home servers more [...]
about Who are you?
Sat, 20.03.2010 02:15
Ich bin im Rahmen der Diskussi
on um das Zugangserschwerungsg
esetz auf dein Blog gestoßen.
Als Linux-Begeisterter d [...]
Sat, 20.03.2010 00:32
The article doesn't explain wh
y the adquisition of Sun is go
ing to be a sucessfull. It onl
y says that we all know: [...]
Fri, 19.03.2010 20:58
Well, I am being paid to take
care of Solaris 10 systems and
my company will continue to u
se it. But the relativel [...]
Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License
![]() ![]() ![]() Blog Administration |