When you look at the recent SAP SD certifications about the
HP and the
Sun systems based on Intels new hexacore proc, a cursory observer may have the impression, that either Solaris10+MaxDB is much slower than Windows+SQLServer or that Sun has somehow has fscked up the System. But as usual the explanation is in the details: The HP/Microsoft result is a non-unicode result, the Sun result is a unicode result. Why is this important? There is a
good presentation made by SAP about the expected performance impact: between 15% more CPU load on new procs and 30% more CPU load on older procs and 50% more memory by using Unicode. So it´s important to know for reading benchmarketing: You can´t compare non-unicode and unicode benchmark results for SAP.
Comments
Fri, 21.11.2008 17:32
Yes the Storage 7000 series is nice but... If Sun want to survive, and flourish, duri ng the coming economic d [...]
Fri, 21.11.2008 16:14
no sure if it makes sense to c ompare Sun-Technologie to GM? Sun is like the german car-com panies, number one in th [...]
Fri, 21.11.2008 10:24
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/ community/arc/caselog/2008/685 /materials/tenaya-onepage-txt/
Fri, 21.11.2008 07:35
I will not disclose anything m ore than that
Fri, 21.11.2008 03:08
We have X4600s which have four 146GB HDDs in them. We want t he first two as mirrored root disks and the other two [...]