Sun Storage 7310 and Sun Storage 7410 compared

Quicksearch

Disclaimer

The individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.

Navigation

< ZFSviz 0.002 | 100.000 Mitzeichner >

Sun Storage 7310 and Sun Storage 7410 compared

Wednesday, May 27. 2009

Brendan compared the 7310 and the 7410 performancewise in his blog. The results were really impressive:

Workload	7310 Result	7410 Result
NFSv3 streaming read from DRAM	~1.08 Gbytes/sec	~2.02 Gbytes/sec
NFSv3 streaming read from disk	780 Mbytes/sec	1.20 Gbytes/sec
NFSv3 streaming write to disk	~477 Mbytes/sec	~595 Mbytes/sec
NFSv3 read IOPS from DRAM	180,000 IOPS	281,000 IOPS

I want to agree with Brendan - 1 GByte/s is a great result, especially when you consider, that this box wasn´t a fully blown 7310. Just one socket was filed with a CPU. I´m curious how far a fully blown system would go ...

Posted by Joerg Moellenkamp in English, Oracle at 22:48 | Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0)

Defined tags for this entry: storage

Related entries by tags:

View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Talking Solaris. Since yesterday my login at SunSolve/Sun Connection or doing pca (patch retrieval) fails, with login error. I have a valid support contract. Anybody having similar problem, or is this just me. Did notify Sun support, for my case.

#1 Mario Jose Medjeral on 2009-05-28 06:55 (Reply)

Sorted out in 5 minutes via Sun Support live chat. they reset my password and login was functioning again. Sun Support is becoming efficient...Nice Surprise...

#2 Mario Jose Medjeral on 2009-05-28 07:36 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_.
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry