QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
|
Core Factor for SPARC T5 and SPARC M5Tuesday, March 26. 2013Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
So with 8 T5 CPUs I have 128 Cores x 0.5 = 64 CPU Oracle Database licenses?
![]() Good that you can setup cpu-capped zones ![]()
#1
on
2013-03-27 09:29
Hello.
What about core factor fo M10 processor?
#2
on
2013-03-28 11:30
are there any benchmarks comparing m5 and m10 available?
#3
on
2013-03-28 20:11
The same license factor for physical M5 cores and virtual T5 threads? Oracle really wants customers to buy their Exa packages instead of setting up their own DB servers...
Or did I miss a memo and the licenses now look for the physical cores on the T series as well?
#4
on
2013-04-01 13:29
I don't know where you get the info with the virtual T5 threads, but on all T-classes you are counting physical cores and multiply them with the core factor. It was always this way.
The author does not allow comments to this entry
|
+1The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Comments
about Mon, 01.05.2017 11:21
Thank you for many interesting
blog posts. Good luck with al
l new endeavours!
about Fri, 28.04.2017 13:47
At least with ZFS this isn't c
orrect. A rmdir for example do
esn't trigger a zil_commit, as
long as you don't speci [...]
about Thu, 27.04.2017 22:31
You say:
"The following dat
a modifying procedures are syn
chronous: WRITE (with stable f
lag set to FILE_SYNC), C [...]
Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Blog Administration |