Just a pile of junk

Sorry, i'm really p...ed about an article at ZDnet: Some articles are that bad, that you can just call them a pile of junk in lieu of vastly strong, vastly more inpolite words. The recent article of Mr. Dana Blankenhorn is such an example. He wrote about the recent changes to the licensing of Solaris 10. I know that many of you have some strong opinion about that, but titling it with "Oracle taking back OpenSolaris" is just outright wrong and shows that Mr. Blankenhorn doesn't have the nescessary insight into that topic nor he did suffcient research before doing this article. They even used the Opensolaris Logo. So it's not just a typo or something like that.

Because just to say it short: Solaris 10 != OpenSolaris. And that pretty obvious when you put just a minute research via Google into the topic. However this would be a less lurid, less pageview demanding headline, as it doesn't contain the word "open" in conjunction with "take back". But well ... what do you expect from a column called "Linux and Open Source".