QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
|
dd is not a benchmarkMonday, January 11. 2010Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
All I can say to that is "Amen!"
The linked article goes very well into why dd(1M) is such a terrible tool for benchmarking. It's about as accurate for comparing drives as copying to/from them with pcfs(7FS)... ![]() The author does not allow comments to this entry
|
+1The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Comments
about Mon, 01.05.2017 11:21
Thank you for many interesting
blog posts. Good luck with al
l new endeavours!
about Fri, 28.04.2017 13:47
At least with ZFS this isn't c
orrect. A rmdir for example do
esn't trigger a zil_commit, as
long as you don't speci [...]
about Thu, 27.04.2017 22:31
You say:
"The following dat
a modifying procedures are syn
chronous: WRITE (with stable f
lag set to FILE_SYNC), C [...]
Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Blog Administration |