QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
|
< Pretty clear objective ... | The Deliverer's Knowledge: What's the max. number of IP instances per NIC? >
Quotes from the new overview/FAQ document regarding the Oracle/Sun mergerWednesday, October 28. 2009Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
This looks very good. Now we just need the final approval...
#1
on
2009-10-28 15:28
Well, that looks terminal for xVM server.
I hope there's a solution in place soon. With ZFS for VM storage, I'd really like a decent hypervisor for Solaris hosts.
#2
on
2009-10-28 16:04
I can't help noticing that you neglected to quote the "By the way, we may change any or all of these statements twenty seconds into the future" disclaimer at the end of page 5/5.
![]()
Well ... thought the "we expect" would be sufficient
![]() The author does not allow comments to this entry
|
+1The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Comments
about Mon, 01.05.2017 11:21
Thank you for many interesting
blog posts. Good luck with al
l new endeavours!
about Fri, 28.04.2017 13:47
At least with ZFS this isn't c
orrect. A rmdir for example do
esn't trigger a zil_commit, as
long as you don't speci [...]
about Thu, 27.04.2017 22:31
You say:
"The following dat
a modifying procedures are syn
chronous: WRITE (with stable f
lag set to FILE_SYNC), C [...]
Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Blog Administration |