QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
Navigation |
TheRegister about the Triple Parity in ZFSWednesday, July 29. 2009Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
With the consideration of adding triple parity to ZFS, consideration should be made to using every bit on those underlying drives, bypassing the hardware error correction, since ZFS is guaranteeing the integrity of the data.
I'm not sure about this ... at first, as long there are filesystem without checksum protection, you need this protection in the drives. So drives without it, would be special ones and thus more expensive. Or it should be configurable But when i think about the mechanics of the market, this will only happen, when Windows gets such a filesystem. Additionally it's an addtional layer of data protection, so the drive doesn't send every error to the OS.
The author does not allow comments to this entry
|
The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Comments
about Mon, 01.05.2017 11:21
Thank you for many interesting
blog posts. Good luck with al
l new endeavours!
about Fri, 28.04.2017 13:47
At least with ZFS this isn't c
orrect. A rmdir for example do
esn't trigger a zil_commit, as
long as you don't speci [...]
about Thu, 27.04.2017 22:31
You say:
"The following dat
a modifying procedures are syn
chronous: WRITE (with stable f
lag set to FILE_SYNC), C [...]
|