Virtual SMP of VirtualBox 3

I'm a member of

Quicksearch

Codenews Search

Disclaimer

The individual owning this blog works at Sun Microsystems GmbH in Germany, a subsidiary of Oracle. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.

Navigation

< A pledge | Kompetenz in Computersicherheit >

Virtual SMP of VirtualBox 3

Wednesday, July 1. 2009

Jeff Savit wrote an interesting article about theVirtual SMP functionality of VirtualBox 3:

This is a really big step. Now you can host guests with up to 32 virtual CPUs on machines with VT-X or AMD-V. Think of all the work that had to be done to provide architecturally consistent CPU and memory in the virtual machine while dispatching virtual CPUs. This affects locking and atomic memory semantics, CPU scheduling to prevent starvation - a lot of things to think about and implement. I may wind up eating my words, but 32 virtual CPUs ought to be enough to handle most people for a very long time.

Posted by Joerg Moellenkamp in English, Sun/Oracle at 20:41 | Comments (4) | Trackbacks (0)
View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

"640K [RAM] ought to be enough for anybody."

-- Bill Gates

#1 Anon Ymous on 2009-07-01 20:48 (Reply)

In Anbedacht dessen hat ja Jeff auch geschrieben "I may wind up eating my words, but 32 virtual CPUs ought to be enough to handle most people for a very long time.".

PS: Ich wusste in dem Moment,in dem ich diesen Artikel online gestellt habe, das Du genau diesen Text dort hinstellen wirst.

#2 Joerg Moellenkamp (Homepage) on 2009-07-01 21:24 (Reply)

ach bin ich schon so durchschaubar?

ich glaube ich brauch ein neues pseudonym...

#2.1 soumY nonA on 2009-07-02 16:03 (Reply)

Wundert mich dass so viel in eine Server-basierende Lösung investiert wird im Gegensatz zu den Hypervisor Alternativen. Was ist denn Serverseitig (VDI?) der Vorteil von VirtualBox gegenueber den anderen Alternativen? Das Deployment?

Gruss
Bernd

#3 Bernd Eckenfels (Homepage) on 2009-07-02 23:21 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_.
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry

View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog

Competition entry by David Cummins powered by Serendipity v1.0

Links in this article

Virtual SMP functionality

The LKSF book

The book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here

Twitterfeeds

twitter.com/c0t0d0s0
just blogged: links for 2010-03-19: Gedanken eines Fliegenden: Freikoerperkultur ... http://bit.ly/c21ARU

twitter.com/codenews
6935782 need to manually increment build number one more time http://bit.ly/aMqEbX

twitter.com/SunPatches
Security patch: 120228-40 - Messaging Server 6.3-11.01: core patch. Available for SPARC since Mar/17/10. http://bit.ly/bk1hw3

twitter.com/SolPatchesX86
122301-49 - SunOS 5.9_x86: Kernel Patch. Available since Mar/17/10. http://bit.ly/9ETInV

twitter.com/SolPatchesSPARC
122300-49 - SunOS 5.9: Kernel Patch. Available since Mar/17/10. http://bit.ly/b9ZvRJ