QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
|
Amsterdam crash ...Saturday, February 28. 2009Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
However, the most salient logical theory seems to be about a wake turbulence caused by the bigger plane that landed just ahead of the crashed plane. That there should have been more time between the two. I'm just beginning to see mentions of this theory and wonder why MSM hasn't yet. What you say is true but SOME things are known fairly quickly and serious ones should be reported before all the committees get done with their work.
Iīm reading quite often the reports of flight accidents ... and really often the reasons are counterintuitive .... and often not the ones in speculation at the beginning. And why should they report about the stuff before all informations and theories are validates? Most people canīt even bring such informations into the right context ... and the reasons for a crash isnīt always that easy like searching for some feathers ...
|
+1The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License
![]() ![]() ![]() Blog AdministrationDonateOkay, okay ... as several people have asked for it ... but you know my opinion.
|