I'm a member of
Quicksearch
Codenews Search
Disclaimer
The individual owning this blog works at Sun Microsystems GmbH in Germany, a subsidiary of Oracle. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
Navigation
Categories
About this blog- Apple
- iPhone
- Aviation
- Bahn
- Begriffe des Lebens
- Blogosphere
- Braindump
- Business Travel
- CANBOX
- CeBIT
- CEC
- Computing
- del.icio.us
- Fundsache
- General
- HHOSUG
- i hate sundays
- Kochen
- Mindfuck
- Movies
- Music
- On Benchmarketing
- Persoenliches Pech
- Photographie
- policy of ...
- Privacy
- Recommended Blogs
- Security
- Solaris
- Strange Days
- Sun/Oracle
- suncec2007
- suncec2008
- Technology
- The IT Business
- Toolbox
- Travel
- Work
The Mysql deal in the hindsight
Thursday, January 29. 2009
This article of Matt Assay is a nice answer to all this RedHat versus Sun talk of the recent time because of similar market capitalisation:
Perhaps Sun Microsystems' valuation of MySQL wasn't too far off. Sun acquired the open-source database leader in January 2008 for a whopping $1 billion, a sum that many rational people thought was way too high. Perhaps they were wrong; $1 billion is beginning to look like a bargain. [...] That is phenomenal growth, and it puts MySQL on a fast track to catch up and perhaps surpass Red Hat, in terms of sales.The article is a really interesting read.
Posted by Joerg Moellenkamp
in English, Sun/Oracle
at
18:14
| Comments (3)
| Trackbacks (0)
View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog
Defined tags for this entry: sun
View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Am einfachsten ließe sich alles refinanzieren, wenn Sun echte Mysql- Appliances mit OpenSol+Mysql+x64+GUI anbieten würde, wo jedermann alle Features von Mysql einfach nutzen könnte
Indeed! I cannot understand why Sun is not offering complete hardware-software packages. A RDBMS-Server or a Java EE Application Server like Fishworks Storage.
Like the Unified Storage boxes, there should be boxes who can be just plugged into the wall and are ready to go. Everything should be optimized and securely configured. With a web gui for the administration by the customer.
I think it would be great if Sun would offer a x4150 with Solaris 10, Glassfish Enterprise v2.1, Sun Java System Web Server as a reverse proxy for glassfish. Everything perfectly configured and tuned. No security or performance headaches. A web gui for minimal configuration.
Additionally the MySQL box described above. And a x4250 with Solaris 10 and PostgreSQL.
Everything bundled with support for the hardware and all software components. This way, a small startup could develop a software and host it by them self, without having to learn tons of administration skills or hiring full-time developers.
It still would be easier and still cheaper to buy such an appliance - even with the support contracts added.
At the moment, one has to buy every product separately and to configure the software on ones own.
Why are you offering this excellent Unified Storage Product, but not somethin similar in the Application Server and Database Server area?
BTW, I am still sad that you did not put this 1B$ into your PostgreSQL department and into PostgreSQL marketing. PostgreSQL seems to match your hardware philosophy much, much more: it scales vertically up to 8 or evene 16 cores, whereas MySQL scales only up to 1 or 2 cores (with more than two cores the performance degrades rapidly with a counting number of concurrent requests, especially with more than 100 requests per second ). Since Sun is promoting multi-thread architectures so heavily, PostgreSQL does seem to be a far better match for Sun Servers. And no, not every DB-Problem can be sharded!
But I understand the marketing thoughts regarding the MySQL momentum and the accounting numbers of the article, of course.
Like the Unified Storage boxes, there should be boxes who can be just plugged into the wall and are ready to go. Everything should be optimized and securely configured. With a web gui for the administration by the customer.
I think it would be great if Sun would offer a x4150 with Solaris 10, Glassfish Enterprise v2.1, Sun Java System Web Server as a reverse proxy for glassfish. Everything perfectly configured and tuned. No security or performance headaches. A web gui for minimal configuration.
Additionally the MySQL box described above. And a x4250 with Solaris 10 and PostgreSQL.
Everything bundled with support for the hardware and all software components. This way, a small startup could develop a software and host it by them self, without having to learn tons of administration skills or hiring full-time developers.
It still would be easier and still cheaper to buy such an appliance - even with the support contracts added.
At the moment, one has to buy every product separately and to configure the software on ones own.
Why are you offering this excellent Unified Storage Product, but not somethin similar in the Application Server and Database Server area?
BTW, I am still sad that you did not put this 1B$ into your PostgreSQL department and into PostgreSQL marketing. PostgreSQL seems to match your hardware philosophy much, much more: it scales vertically up to 8 or evene 16 cores, whereas MySQL scales only up to 1 or 2 cores (with more than two cores the performance degrades rapidly with a counting number of concurrent requests, especially with more than 100 requests per second ). Since Sun is promoting multi-thread architectures so heavily, PostgreSQL does seem to be a far better match for Sun Servers. And no, not every DB-Problem can be sharded!
But I understand the marketing thoughts regarding the MySQL momentum and the accounting numbers of the article, of course.
I forgot:
The most important part would be a dtrace-GUI, of course! If you would complete the storage server products from the firshworks product line with fishworks database severs and fishworks java application servers (Unified Database, Unified Application Serving), that would be mindboggingling awesome!!! If you could offer that to a price maybe twice of the mere hardware price for the boxes, than it would be really cheap for your customers - compared to hiring lots of tech staff.
Just with the Unified Storage products, there would be nothing really new: all technologies are already available from Sun. But put together with a nice web gui, it would be incredibly more useful for your customers with limited tech staff.
Additionally, there could be a premium line with the M-Series or Rock in a few months: Postgresql on top of Solaris 10 on a M3000 with a disk array and a fishworks gui including dtrace and Glassfish with Sun Java System Web Server as a reverse proxy and Solaris 10 on a M-3000 (or Rock) server and a fishworks web gui including dtrace for customers, who wish to have extreme reliability.
This would make your products so much easier to use! And the fishworks team cannot have that much trouble to extend the gui including the dtrace gui to RDBMSs and Java Application Servers.
Did I mention that it would be super crazy awesome???
The most important part would be a dtrace-GUI, of course! If you would complete the storage server products from the firshworks product line with fishworks database severs and fishworks java application servers (Unified Database, Unified Application Serving), that would be mindboggingling awesome!!! If you could offer that to a price maybe twice of the mere hardware price for the boxes, than it would be really cheap for your customers - compared to hiring lots of tech staff.
Just with the Unified Storage products, there would be nothing really new: all technologies are already available from Sun. But put together with a nice web gui, it would be incredibly more useful for your customers with limited tech staff.
Additionally, there could be a premium line with the M-Series or Rock in a few months: Postgresql on top of Solaris 10 on a M3000 with a disk array and a fishworks gui including dtrace and Glassfish with Sun Java System Web Server as a reverse proxy and Solaris 10 on a M-3000 (or Rock) server and a fishworks web gui including dtrace for customers, who wish to have extreme reliability.
This would make your products so much easier to use! And the fishworks team cannot have that much trouble to extend the gui including the dtrace gui to RDBMSs and Java Application Servers.
Did I mention that it would be super crazy awesome???
Links in this article
The LKSF book
The book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Twitterfeeds
twitter.com/c0t0d0s0
Uploaded to Flickr: DSC_0093 http://bit.ly/9QPykw
twitter.com/codenews
6932434 AAC adapter GUI hang when creating or deleting RAID http://bit.ly/cZVKE0
twitter.com/SunPatches
128365-04 - Sun Crypto Accelerator 6000 1.1: Driver Patch. Available for SPARC since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/agl9Nw
twitter.com/SolPatchesX86
118192-04 - SunOS 5.9_x86: gtar patch. Available since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/cbnoJ7
twitter.com/SolPatchesSPARC
118191-04 - SunOS 5.9: gtar patch. Available since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/cb2Drj
Uploaded to Flickr: DSC_0093 http://bit.ly/9QPykw
twitter.com/codenews
6932434 AAC adapter GUI hang when creating or deleting RAID http://bit.ly/cZVKE0
twitter.com/SunPatches
128365-04 - Sun Crypto Accelerator 6000 1.1: Driver Patch. Available for SPARC since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/agl9Nw
twitter.com/SolPatchesX86
118192-04 - SunOS 5.9_x86: gtar patch. Available since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/cbnoJ7
twitter.com/SolPatchesSPARC
118191-04 - SunOS 5.9: gtar patch. Available since Mar/19/10. http://bit.ly/cb2Drj
Web 2.0
Contact
Networking
open.bc
LinkedIn
Facebook
My photos
- mail: joerg@c0t0d0s0.org
- icq: 144000169
- Me, myself and I
- openBC
- My del.icio.us
- c0t0d0s0@twitter
- c0t0d0s0@last.fm
- wiki@c0t0d0s0
- Amazon Wishlist
Networking
open.bc
My photos
Syndication
Tagged articles
AMD Apple avs Bahn Blogging Blogosphere braindump Business Travel CeBIT cec cec2006 CMT del.icio.us deutsch dtrace fliegen Fundsache General Hamburg IBM i hate sundays Intel iscsi jumpstart Links Linux lksf Mindfuck Movies Music Musik Niagara Opensolaris Opteron Photographie policy of ... Politik Security Solaris storage Sun suncec2007 sunw t1 The IT Business Ultrasparc ultrasparc t1 Wirtschaft Work ZFS
Comments
about Reengining
Sat, 20.03.2010 21:36
I didn't have special interest
in airplanes, but your articl
es about airplanes are very go
od. They have made to ta [...]
Sat, 20.03.2010 08:55
Yes. And I just don't like the
way they're killing all of Su
n brands.
They could just buy
, help, let live, contro [...]
Sat, 20.03.2010 08:49
Well, I don't think many peopl
e were using Solaris at home b
efore Oracle acquisition too,
I see home servers more [...]
about Who are you?
Sat, 20.03.2010 02:15
Ich bin im Rahmen der Diskussi
on um das Zugangserschwerungsg
esetz auf dein Blog gestoßen.
Als Linux-Begeisterter d [...]
Sat, 20.03.2010 00:32
The article doesn't explain wh
y the adquisition of Sun is go
ing to be a sucessfull. It onl
y says that we all know: [...]
Buttons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License
