A kind of Time Machine

Quicksearch

Disclaimer

The individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.

Navigation

< links for 2008-10-14 | About going private ... and about gambling >

Tuesday, October 14. 2008

The Time Machine in Mac OS 10.5 saved my butt a few times in the last few months. Getting back an older version of a presentation when you´ve saved a short version of you presentation in the same file as the long version a few days earlier is quite handy. Solaris is now capable to do a similar thing (albeit the implementation is vastly different): Time Slider is based on periodic ZFS snapshots and presents them in a nice way:

Time slider is one of the new feature that will be available in OpenSolaris 2008.11.Time slider provides an automatic way to backup your data on the same disc using one of Sun's ZFS filesystem unique features, snapshots. With time slider you can browse and recover files from snapshot backups using the GNOME file manager.

When you click on the life buoy in the File Brower you get a slider to step back in time based on this snapshhhhhh ... wait ... just look at the screenshots at Erwann Chénedé's weblog. A picture substitutes 1000 words and this feature is outright incredible. Excellent work!

Posted by Joerg Moellenkamp in English, Solaris at 19:58 | Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0)

Defined tags for this entry: gnome

, solaris

, time slider

, zfs

Related entries by tags:

View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

You know, I kinda hate to say this, and I think it chimes in with the register post on taking Sun private.

I too earlier today saw this posting and immediately thought of time machine. The ZFS snapshots are probably way more efficient.

But and here is the kicker, the time machine implementation has been out there for at least year, it (and I'm not a mac fanboy here - i actually do Solaris administration for a living) looks fantastic, major eye (as well as fantastic feature) candy, which is/does shift copies of MacOS X.

Look at those screenshots you linked to, compare to time machine screenshots. I tell you the MacOS version just looks a 100 times snazzier.

I know, I know, looks are not everything, and you are right Sun has some great products out there - I kinda love thumper, but there do seem to be a lot of articles about Sun financial postion. And you guys made some dumb decisions in the mid 2000's - killing of solaris x86 then resurrecting - slaps forehead now.

cheers,

jason.

#1 jason arneil (Homepage) on 2008-10-14 22:08 (Reply)

I don´t think it will take too long, until someone takes the the stuff and creates the Timetunnel view with Compiz or something like that.

I´m a Mac user and i know the visuals of Time Machine are really cool. The problem ... it relies on the 3d graphic libraries of the MacOS 10.5 operating enviroment. You don´t have a 3d accelerator in the SunRay system, you don´t have a 3d accelerator in every supported hardware (for example an Ultra10 or Ultra 60 workstation). The way it´s done today dont exclude the user of system non-capable to compute parts of the GUI in the GPU.

#2 Joerg+M. (Homepage) on 2008-10-15 06:00 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_.
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry