QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
|
40 GBit/s InfinibandTuesday, June 10. 2008Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Infiniband and Solaris? I can hardly think of anything more painful I tried this year!
Infiniband will never replace Ethernet. It is not designed for that, cant't be redundant and will burn CPU-power.
Try to use Mellanox Cards , their driver is stable and the documentation is up to date
www.infinibandnews.com
Could you elaborate you findings with Infiniband and Solaris ? Iīve worked twice with it in the last months and didnīt find somethin especially painful ...
I think, used in conjunction with RDMA enabled protocols the load on CPU will me smaller than with a Ethernet. And of course cou can create redudant links into the fabric. Of course it wonīt subsistute Ethernet for the campus network, but for the in-datacenter network this is a dofferent story.
Which cards did ypu use? SDR, DDR or even connect-X?
We tried several cards, but just the old crappy PCI-X cards from Voltaire worked with Solaris10U5/ Opensolaris. What did you do with the IB-stuff? MPI? SRP? Trying to avoid SPOFs with Infiniband like synchronizing 2 subnet managers on different networks it is painful! I don't think switches with integrates subnetmanager can be configured like this. |
+1The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License
![]() ![]() ![]() Blog AdministrationDonateOkay, okay ... as several people have asked for it ... but you know my opinion.
|