QuicksearchCodenews SearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works at Sun Microsystems GmbH in Germany, a subsidiary of Oracle. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
NavigationCategories
|
Cloudcomputing@MicrosoftTuesday, June 3. 2008Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I wish Microsoft would put millions of Sun built servers into that cloud. However, Ben Rockwood's assesment of Sun's X86 gear yesterday is chilling. He's been harping about these problems for quite some time now. Is he out of his mind or is Sun simply completley out of touch with its customers?
I wont say, that Ben is out mind as well i wont say, that Sun is out of touch with the customers.
The CDLP power-cycling is common to many actual systems. You will find that in the release notes for Dell PE2950 or many IBM servers (i found that with a fast search via Google). Of course e1000g are stellar adapters but using nge has its own advantages: chip count (strangely the failure rate doesn´t correlate much with the complexity of the chips, it correlates with the number of chips), the using ofwhats already there. There is just one thing i´m heartly concur to: I would prefer the usage of ILOM through all systems. But at the end: You can make it all correct in the first throw and be 2 years late, or you deliver at an earlier moment and earn some money.
Sun did it right before on the v20z and v40z (yeah, I know they weren't built by sun, but ...)
First round with the x4100 and x4200 were almost acceptable, but it's been going downhill since then. Even if there's an early mover factor, that's no excuse for the remote exploits and continued other bloopers. |
Links in this articleThe LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Twitterfeedstwitter.com/c0t0d0s0
@Tanja71 auuuuuuuaaaa :) twitter.com/codenews 6933239 An assertion fail in callout.c on Emerald system in snv_135 http://bit.ly/cHzbFO twitter.com/SunPatches Security patch: 120228-40 - Messaging Server 6.3-11.01: core patch. Available for SPARC since Mar/17/10. http://bit.ly/bk1hw3 twitter.com/SolPatchesX86 122301-49 - SunOS 5.9_x86: Kernel Patch. Available since Mar/17/10. http://bit.ly/9ETInV twitter.com/SolPatchesSPARC 122300-49 - SunOS 5.9: Kernel Patch. Available since Mar/17/10. http://bit.ly/b9ZvRJ Web 2.0Contact
Networking open.bc My photos SyndicationTagged articlesAMD Apple avs Bahn Blogging Blogosphere braindump Business Travel CeBIT cec cec2006 CMT del.icio.us deutsch dtrace fliegen Fundsache General Hamburg IBM i hate sundays Intel iscsi jumpstart Links Linux lksf Mindfuck Movies Music Musik Niagara Opensolaris Opteron Photographie policy of ... Politik Security Solaris storage Sun suncec2007 sunw t1 The IT Business Ultrasparc ultrasparc t1 Wirtschaft Work ZFS
Comments about Ich bin angewidert ....
Thu, 18.03.2010 01:23
Viel gute Argumente für nichts
und einen armen Irren: der Me
nsch ist ein Wahnsinniger der
mehr in die Euthanasie-I [...]
Wed, 17.03.2010 21:59
Got a few checksum errors mond
ay morning this week in a 400
GB mirrored Pool with Raw Devi
ces, all Disk were mappe [...]
about Who are you?
Wed, 17.03.2010 20:37
Informatik Student.
Finde das
breite Spektrum des Blogs tol
l und da ich mich für Unix und
Solaris sowie SPARC bes [...]
about SolarOS
Wed, 17.03.2010 20:34
about Ich bin angewidert ....
Wed, 17.03.2010 18:32
Buttons![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License
![]() ![]() ![]() Blog Administration |