QuicksearchNavigationEventsTrusted AdBlower Door Test
Luftdichtigkeitsmessung für Gebäude Raum Hamburg ab 160 € excl. MwSt www.m-tectum.de Kategorien
|
The future of mysql (The Project)Sunday, April 20. 2008Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Does anybody know where postgres' shortcomings are (compared to those of mysql)?
The last slide is not very surprising when you followed the latest discussions on more mysql centric sites or blogs. One paradigm of software development ist to "release early, release often". Sun follows this rule and provides us with fresh opensolaris builds that contain many new features. Now comes the interesting point: when the feature is mature the sell it to their "paying customers". MySQL AB seems to do it the other way round: integrate new features and provide them only in the enterprise line. Now your customers will test your hot new code (why comes Microsoft to my mind here?). When the have earned enough money (or whatever) the feature also moves into the community build. Now you have a really huge userbase that is willing to use every feature your product has. They will push your now not so fresh code to it's limits and fill your bug tracker. Enterprise customers are aware of this feature-bug correlation. This is why the stay more conservative about using new features. But now it might be too late: how many bad design conditions will be reworked? It is already in the product and some ignorants will label it as mature. As a result you have a not so well working feature that nobody will use because it doesn't work as expected (your customers also expect speed on large datasets. no excuses allowed in an enterprise world). Customer satisfaction looks different. This is why their competitors have their hot new stuff in their open source products and only sell the matured part as enterprise products. We will see how long the MySQL model will survive against the classic approach which SUN adopted.
In my opinion SUN is doing much better in understand how open source works than MySQL does now. This is the surprising part. I hope for the future of MySQL that SUN will have some influence here. As a little side note: I expect the ratio enterprise/community users of SUN software is much higher than MySQLs. Regardless they trust the community more. |
The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking open.bc My photos SyndicationComments about INTJ Thu, 04.12.2008 23:55 "Detected language German. The only supported languages are English and Swedish. But stay tuned, we are expanding. [...] about Leaked Airbus "787 lessons learned" presentation Thu, 04.12.2008 22:09 Funny .. i guess another lesso ns learnt case would be: Do not circulate too much confid ential information among [...] about Overpopulated Thu, 04.12.2008 17:36 Oh yeah, try being on a dual q uad core and running MenuMeter s, just the CPUs alone take up a lot of space. Can [...] about Deutschsprachiger Anwenderbericht zu Opensolaris 2008.11 Thu, 04.12.2008 15:41 Jo ... einige Dinge sind nicht ganz korrekt ... aber im gros sen und ganzen finde ich den T ext gut about Deutschsprachiger Anwenderbericht zu Opensolaris 2008.11 Thu, 04.12.2008 15:17 "Ab Version 2008.11 kann man a uch von ZFS booten." na das ging aber auch schon mit 2008 .05... Getaggte ArtikelAMD Apple avs Bahn Blogging Blogosphere braindump Business Travel CeBIT cec cec2006 CMT del.icio.us deutsch dtrace fliegen Fundsache General Hamburg IBM i hate sundays Intel iscsi jumpstart Links Linux lksf Mindfuck Movies Music Musik Niagara Opensolaris Opteron Photographie policy of ... Politik Security Solaris storage Sun suncec2007 sunw t1 The IT Business Ultrasparc ultrasparc t1 Wirtschaft Work ZFS
Blog Administration |