Benchmarketing again - this time: TPC-H 10 TB

HHOSUG

Quicksearch

Navigation

Events

< Reuse of communication | IBM´s TPC-H claim revisted - or: Has IBM something to hide? >

Benchmarketing again - this time: TPC-H 10 TB

Thursday, November 29. 2007

Wow, it´s benchmarketing time at IBM again. IBM Announces DB2 and POWER6 Combo Trounces HP and Sun by 2x and 3x Respectively in New Business Intelligence Benchmark. IBM you are soooo great .... you was able to beat our TPC-H 10 TB by a factor of 3. It´s really an technological archievement in 2007 to beat a TPC-H benchmark result generated on on 29th November 2005 ... exactly 2 years ago today. Come on ... in IT 2 years are a fscking long time ....

Everytime i read a benchmark from IBM, i really looking forward to read their disclosure to see, what you can do in benchmarking, when you have nearly unlimited resources.

The configuration of IBM consists out of: 32 p6 p570 servers, each server had 32 GB of memory, resulting in 1 TB memory. Each of the systems had 96 36 Gigabyte 15k harddisks with 4 GB/s FC. A whooping amount of 3072 harddisks. A fully 10 GB enabled network.

The SF25K result was done on 1296 disk, with 10k rounds with 2 GB/s. The memory had a size of 288 GB. On a single system with a single operating system image The system used the old UltraSPARC with 1.5 GHz

Not that you can´t buy an system from Sun equivalent system from IBM. The venerable SF25k now has up to 1.15 TB per domain. And the M9000 class servers are a completly different story. But,dear IBM,when you want to make a statement of relative performance, the system should be at least somewhat similar.

So dear IBM, next time you want to showcase you system, don´t do it against a benchmark 2 years old. What´s the statement of such a press announcement: We are 3 times faster with our top of the line system with a benchmarking configuration than a 2 years old configuration. Big deal, IBM, really big deal ...

Posted by Joerg Moellenkamp in English, Sun at 18:01 | Comments (6) | Trackback (1)

Defined tags for this entry: benchmarketing

, ibm

, sun

, tpc-h

View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

IBM´s TPC-H claim revisted - or: Has IBM something to hide?
I thought a little bit about the TPC-H benchmark published by IBM yesterday. There is something in it, that leaves some question. The p570 is a 8 socket system. You can build it by stacking 4 two-socket boxes with some special cabling. That´s one of the p

Weblog: c0t0d0s0.org
Tracked: Nov 30, 09:39

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Das ist wie bei Versicherungen: Wer liest schon das Kleingedruckte?

#1 Patrick (Homepage) on 2007-11-29 20:35 (Reply)

Not to mention that the ibm systems is bound to be several times more expensive than the sun system.

#2 Mads (Homepage) on 2007-11-29 21:38 (Reply)

Oldest trick in the book - compare your current server to an old product of your competitors - or in this case, IBM compares 32 of their newest machines to only 1 2 year old machine from Sun. They must not be able to do the single system performance or compete against Sun's recent boxes.

#3 Jeff Savit (Homepage) on 2007-11-29 23:10 (Reply)

I agree: This trick is so old, it´s hard to believe they still use it. But: The untold story ist the more interesting part in benchmarking. And using 32 systems instead of 8 is the most interesting part.

#3.1 Joerg (Homepage) on 2007-11-30 12:20 (Reply)

IBMs Marketing and $$$ can outperform everything in marketing live. When you spend 1 Billion on Marketing you can sell shit as pudding. It is still: never has onyone been fired because of buying IBM: hey guys it's time you get fired!!!! Be sure: opensource and Sun will give you all a hell of a fire, relaxing time is gone.

Just my 2 cents.

PS: Yes we have Sunsystems and these boxes work fine, and also yes: I bought Sunshares.

#4 köbes (Homepage) on 2007-11-29 23:58 (Reply)

Hmm, i think "nobody get´s fired for buying ibm" is not correct anymore. It´s more like "Nobody gets fired for x in a x shop". Nobody gets fired for buying IBM in an IBM shop (even it´s nonsensical, i had such a customer in the past, wo wanted to migrate to Linux on IBM Blades, come hell or high water) as well nobody gets fired for buying Sun in a Sun shop.

#4.1 Joerg (Homepage) on 2007-11-30 12:24 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_.
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry

View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog

Competition entry by David Cummins powered by Serendipity v1.0

Links in this article

The LKSF book

The book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here

Twitterfeeds

twitter.com/c0t0d0s0
war ein nettes event in schwetzingen.... dank noch mal an @slashme fuer die moeglichkeit zum vortrag

twitter.com/codenews
6853745 Same ereport is generated every 10 seconds automatically in looping after error injection http://tinyurl.com/nwldlg

twitter.com/SunPatches
122186-13 - McData fibre channel director switch firmware e/osn 9.9.3 for i10K. Available since Jul/02/09. http://tinyurl.com/nmu5zs

twitter.com/SolPatchesX86
121431-38 - SunOS 5.8_x86 5.9_x86 5.10_x86: Live Upgrade Patch. Available since Jul/02/09. http://tinyurl.com/m44dul

twitter.com/SolPatchesSPARC
121430-37 - SunOS 5.8 5.9 5.10: Live Upgrade Patch. Available since Jul/02/09. http://tinyurl.com/mr4yqe