QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
Navigation |
EAL 4+ RHEL5 and Solaris 10 TX - Comparision of the evaluation targetsFriday, June 29. 2007Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Hi
You have remote desktop. Its not good practice to allow USB disk on a server in a datacenter. We are talking about datacenter solutions and security policies. Not a user desktop in first hand. I think it is a meaningfull certification that you can use as a ground for a security policy in a datacenter. And you have it for system p, x, i and z. All the stack.
#1
on
2007-12-17 14:56
1. Was the remote desktop part of the certification ?
2. The Client was certified as well. But without even the most basic desktop functionalities 3. The certification of Redhat doesn´t look as far fetching as the certification of Trusted Solaris or the Trusted Extensions (after the upcoming certification in the LSPP) The author does not allow comments to this entry
|
The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Comments
about Mon, 01.05.2017 11:21
Thank you for many interesting
blog posts. Good luck with al
l new endeavours!
about Fri, 28.04.2017 13:47
At least with ZFS this isn't c
orrect. A rmdir for example do
esn't trigger a zil_commit, as
long as you don't speci [...]
about Thu, 27.04.2017 22:31
You say:
"The following dat
a modifying procedures are syn
chronous: WRITE (with stable f
lag set to FILE_SYNC), C [...]
|