Quicksearch
Disclaimer
The individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
EAL 4+ RHEL5 and Solaris 10 TX - Comparision of the evaluation targets
Friday, June 29. 2007
Jim Laurent worte an nice comparisiion of the EAL 4+ evaluation targets between RHEL 5 and Solaris 10 with Trusted Extensions. It look like, that IBM/Red Hat leaved out most of the difficult parts. Perhaps out of technical reasons, perhaps to be a few month faster for a marketing stunt at the price of having an meaningless certification, as it excludes many standard parts of a modern Linux implementation (no desktop, no swapable disks, no networked trusted printing, but it read your self).
Posted by Joerg Moellenkamp
in English, Solaris
at
21:19
| Comments (2)
| Trackbacks (0)
Defined tags for this entry: Solaris
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Hi
You have remote desktop.
Its not good practice to allow USB disk on a server in a datacenter.
We are talking about datacenter solutions and security policies. Not a user desktop in first hand.
I think it is a meaningfull certification that you can use as a ground for a security policy in a datacenter.
And you have it for system p, x, i and z. All the stack.
You have remote desktop.
Its not good practice to allow USB disk on a server in a datacenter.
We are talking about datacenter solutions and security policies. Not a user desktop in first hand.
I think it is a meaningfull certification that you can use as a ground for a security policy in a datacenter.
And you have it for system p, x, i and z. All the stack.
1. Was the remote desktop part of the certification ?
2. The Client was certified as well. But without even the most basic desktop functionalities
3. The certification of Redhat doesn´t look as far fetching as the certification of Trusted Solaris or the Trusted Extensions (after the upcoming certification in the LSPP)
2. The Client was certified as well. But without even the most basic desktop functionalities
3. The certification of Redhat doesn´t look as far fetching as the certification of Trusted Solaris or the Trusted Extensions (after the upcoming certification in the LSPP)
+1
The LKSF book
The book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0
Contact
Networking
xing.com
LinkedIn
Facebook
My photos
- mail: joerg@c0t0d0s0.org
- icq: 144000169
- Me, myself and I
- openBC
- My del.icio.us
- c0t0d0s0@twitter
- c0t0d0s0@last.fm
- wiki@c0t0d0s0
- Amazon Wishlist
Networking
xing.com
My photos
Comments
about Nanosecond
Wed, 23.05.2012 00:11
I remember this being drummed
into us during Digital Design
at Uni. It's important to cons
ider it when laying out [...]
Mon, 21.05.2012 18:04
Hello Kevin, Im not surprised
with what you are seeing or ha
ve seen when attaching a SSD t
o a USB2.0. USB3.0 helps [...]
Mon, 21.05.2012 04:44
Hi Greg,
With regards to IO
PS I have seen terrible result
s using a 60GB SATA2 SSD with
USB2.0 - USB2 really cho [...]
about ZFS Dedup Internals
Sat, 19.05.2012 09:50
There is no impact to boot/imp
ort times, as the DDT is loade
d as needed ... so the pool is
imported as fast as wit [...]
Buttons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Germany License
