A thought about Solaris and AIX

Quicksearch

Disclaimer

The individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.

Navigation

< Testing methods for I/O | The LPARS conundrum >

A thought about Solaris and AIX

Tuesday, May 29. 2007

"Vista is compared to Mac OS X what AIX is compared to Solaris. Starts to be a cheap rip off"

Posted by Joerg Moellenkamp in English, Sun/Oracle at 11:57 | Comments (3) | Trackbacks (0)

Defined tags for this entry: solaris

, Sun

Related entries by tags:

View as PDF: This entry | This month | Full blog

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

AIX hat ein besseres Marketing als Solaris?

#1 Olli on 2007-05-29 12:47 (Reply)

Ja ... anscheinend schon ... IBM im allgemeinen ... oder kannst Du dir sonst erklaeren, warum IBMler an einem Feature hängen, das ihnen gleich hochzweistellig den Prozessor auffrisst, oder das sie es schaffen Linux on Mainframe auf Jahre in den Medien zu halten ...

#1.1 Joerg (Homepage) on 2007-05-29 12:57 (Reply)

Das mit dem Marketing ist aber auch ein Problem von SUN. Haette SUN ein besseres Marketing, waere das nicht wirklich verkehrt.

#1.2 solarix (Homepage) on 2007-06-10 21:14 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_.
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry