QuicksearchNavigationEvents12.01 - 1. Treffen MUCOSUG
20.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Langen
22.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Stuttgart
27.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Berlin
27.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Berlin
29.01 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Hamburg
03.02 - SAF "Neue Wege der IT in Zeiten der Wirtschaftskrise" - Sun GS Ratingen
![]() Kategorien
|
Dual licensing Solaris?Thursday, January 18. 2007Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Up to now, I can't see any real benefit here. This may change depending on the final version of the GPLv3 though, and I hope sincerely, that no final commitment is made before the final version is evaluated. It's good to know that Sun isn't considering licensing as some kind of religious issue, but that's something that's quite clear from reading the CDDL already.
I'm not so sure though that double-licensing just in order to appease those people who do treat licensing as a religious issue would do any good. I'm not so sure either, if double licensing wouldn't just add to confusion for those customers, who might be worried about licensing issues. Some kind of "licensing FAQ" might do more in that regard.
From a "pragmatic" point of view, on a production it doesn't really matter whether the system is GPL-, CDDL-, BSD- or whatever-licensed. Here, looking at a distribution like Nexenta, I just see a benefit in having a homogenous licensing applied to both the kernel and most of the base system (which, in this case, happens to be GNU).
That aside (also in reply to Tatjana): There indeed are people who care about "free" software, "free" in the terms outlined by the GNU GPL and/or the GNU manifest, and I would indeed like this to be seen as a personal preference rather than a "religious issue". To those (including myself, personally), the idea of having another "free software" kernel to choose from is a good thing, that's why I am looking forward to an GPL'ed OpenSolaris, that's why I would embrace this system as soon as it's there... |
The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking open.bc My photos SyndicationComments about 1. Treffen der Hamburger (Open)Solaris Users Group Fri, 09.01.2009 19:14 Klasse, Mittwochs bin ich sowi eso immer im Sun office about I had a bad day Fri, 09.01.2009 14:19 Such a crap! Fuckin' thiefs! I totally understand what hard hit this is. My Camera equipme nt summarizes even a lit [...] about links for 2009-01-09 Fri, 09.01.2009 12:15 "If you spend any time in OOo at all, you are likely to conc lude that all major decisions are made by a small circ [...] about I had a bad day Fri, 09.01.2009 07:35 Dein Bruder könnte mal in sein er KFZ und Hausratversicherung nach dem Deckungsumfang schau en. Evtl. bekommt man d [...] about The Sell Rating from Goldman Sucks Fri, 09.01.2009 01:24 Looks like The Reg have picked up on this as well - they can 't hardly have a week without a Sun share price story. [...] Getaggte ArtikelAMD Apple avs Bahn Blogging Blogosphere braindump Business Travel CeBIT cec cec2006 CMT del.icio.us deutsch dtrace fliegen Fundsache General Hamburg IBM i hate sundays Intel iscsi jumpstart Links Linux lksf Mindfuck Movies Music Musik Niagara Opensolaris Opteron Photographie policy of ... Politik Security Solaris storage Sun suncec2007 sunw t1 The IT Business Ultrasparc ultrasparc t1 Wirtschaft Work ZFS
Blog Administration |