QuicksearchDisclaimerThe individual owning this blog works for Oracle in Germany. The opinions expressed here are his own, are not necessarily reviewed in advance by anyone but the individual author, and neither Oracle nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
Navigation |
StorageMojo about Sun Fire X4500Wednesday, July 12. 2006Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Joerg,
It's true - I consider Sun's storage group to be the worst storage marketing group since IBM's under Ellen Hancock in the 90's. It isn't just my opinion though: in 1993 Sun's attach rate was about 75% of the system vendor's average. Today it is less than 50%. I worked at Sun's Network Storage group for several years (95-98) and found it to be a very dysfunctional culture - unlike some other parts of Sun. So tell me - is the storage group marketing the X4500? Doesn't look like it from here, but you tell me. Cheers, Robin The author does not allow comments to this entry
|
The LKSF bookThe book with the consolidated Less known Solaris Tutorials is available for download here
Web 2.0Contact
Networking xing.com My photos Comments
about Mon, 01.05.2017 11:21
Thank you for many interesting
blog posts. Good luck with al
l new endeavours!
about Fri, 28.04.2017 13:47
At least with ZFS this isn't c
orrect. A rmdir for example do
esn't trigger a zil_commit, as
long as you don't speci [...]
about Thu, 27.04.2017 22:31
You say:
"The following dat
a modifying procedures are syn
chronous: WRITE (with stable f
lag set to FILE_SYNC), C [...]
|